|
Home
News
Methodology
Advantages
Origins
Countries
Research
Articles
Extension
Info
CIIFAD
Report
Proceedings
Discussions
|
 |
REPORT
ON BANGLADESH SRI ACTIVITIES
Norman Uphoff, September, 2002
1.
In September 2002, following the International Rice Congress held
in Beijing, I traveled to Dhaka, being met at the airport by Masud
Khan from CARE/Bangladesh. CARE had arranged a national workshop
to be held in Mymensingh upcountry the following day, so we drove
their straight from the airport in the rain. Mymensingh is where
the national agricultural university is located, about 3 hours'
drive from Dhaka. CARE has had SRI activities in that area since
1999/2000 so there are a good number of SRI farmers nearby.
2.
The workshop on September 27 was well attended despite the inclement
weather: about 140 participants, including more than 40 farmers.
Other SRI partners were also represented: the Bangladesh Rice Research
Institute (BRRI), the Department of Agricultural Extension (DAE),
the Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee (BRAC), and Syngenta
(its director of research drove 3 hours both ways to attend the
meeting). The Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture (BINA)
sent its chief scientific officer as BINA is also working with SRI
methods now.
3.
The vice-chancellor of the National Agricultural University opened
the session in the morning and stayed for my presentation. After
tea break, the dean of the Faculty of Agriculture chaired the rest
of the meeting. There were presentations by BRRI, DAE, BINA and
CARE. The three CARE papers presented very detailed results, including
one paper on "farmer perceptions." These included the
often-heard comments about how terrible an SRI field looks for the
first 5 to 6 weeks, but how it then "explodes" with growth,
and neighboring farmers do not ridicule SRI farmers any more.
4.
From my point of view, the highlight of the workshop was the "cultural
event," that was not explained to me beforehand. A musical
ensemble provided background music, playing tabla (drums), harmonium,
flute and percussion instruments, while singing along with the two
actors on stage. The performance was very vigorous and held one's
attention, with dialogue, jokes, singing, dancing, etc. in the traditional
Bangladesh village style of entertainment. It was all in Bangla
language so I could not understand what was said or sung, except
I kept hearing "SRI" every 30-60 seconds. I wondered why
the musicians were singing the songs about SRI so clearly and enthusiastically
until it was explained to me that these were all SRI farmers, who
had written and produced this performance all by themselves.
5.
The two actors played a young farmer (pro-SRI) and his elderly grandfather
(skeptical about SRI and critical of "new ways"). The
latter had a snow-white beard and a cane, and acted very cantankerously.
He sometimes chased the young man around the stage, waving his cane
and chastizing the grandson for his insolence. The only part of
the dialogue that was translated for me (it was very fast-moving)
was when the young man noted, to justify SRI, that since he was
young and could run fast, and the grandfather was old and could
not move very fast, it stood to reason the "young seedlings"
could grow much faster and produce much better than "old seedlings."
This elicited an angry outburst from the grandfather to the merriment
of all.
6.
This kind of combination of dialogue, music and dance is a staple
for village entertainment. The farmers prepared this musical skit
as a way of attracting other villagers' interest and then educating
them about the benefits of SRI and about its basic principles and
practices. The farmers who performed were so excellent I had thought
they were professionals at first. But few professionals would project
such enthusiasm and fervor. CARE said it would provide a video of
the performance to put on the SRI home page on the web. Even if
one cannot understand the Bangla, the music is enjoyable, and farmers
in many countries would enjoy seeing counterparts perform so well,
hearing "SRI" interjected continuously into the Bangla
dialogue.
7.
After the workshop ended, I spent an hour with several Mymensingh
agronomy faculty, meeting in the dean's office. I could tell they
were skeptical about SRI from my conversation with them during the
tea break. But with this additional time I was able to go more into
some of the scientific issues and explanations that had to be skipped
over in the workshop presentation. I had the full presentation in
powerpoint and could go through it using my computer's battery.
After an hour, it appeard they could see that there are some very
plausable, if not always yet fully proven, explanations for the
results that farmers and NGOs have been reporting. (BRRI, like IRRI,
has not had as good results from its on-station trials as farmers
report from their fields.)
8.
The next day, the 26th, a national SRI steering committee meeting
was held, hosted by BRAC at its headquarters in Dhaka. About 20
people were present, not just representatives of the five steering
committee members: BRRI, DAE, CARE, BRAC and Syngenta. We were glad
to have IRRI's representative in Bangladesh, Noel Magor, and its
research management officer, Dr. Abdul Ghani, attending. They announced
that on the previous day, the technical committee for PETRRA, a
DFID-funded project for poverty alleviation through rice research
that IRRI manages in Bangladesh, had approved three grants for SRI
evaluation and extension work. While these are not very large grants,
they should support some valuable activity on SRI.
9.
There was a lot of support expressed at the meeting for collaborative
work on SRI in Bangladesh. The group agreed to meet six times a
year, before and after each of the three seasons (rather than meet
every other month). The next meeting, before the boro season begins,
will focus on establishing an agreed set of information to be collected
by all partners for sharing and comparing results, standardizing
for things like grain moisture content. Any organization can gather
and analyze more information that this, but researchers wanted to
have at least some basic data that will make evaluation of results
more satisfactory.
10.
BRAC's director of research and evaluation, Dr. Muazzam Husain,
is serving as chair of the steering committee. He was previously
a professor of agricultural economics at the national agricultural
university at Mymensingh, so since most leadership in the agricultural
sector have gone through Mymensingh, he extensive contacts that
should be helpful for the SRI enterprise. SC members agreed to rotate
the hosting of the meetings, which was another sign of common purpose.
11.
It was gratifying to be part of a social process that engages such
important institutions and such capable people in Bangladesh, but
even more gratifying to see that this network is operating quite
independently on its own. As with other SRI networks, CIIFAD will
be pleased to work partners in the various countries, but on a collegial
basis, with control and decision-making in national and local hands.
There are networks also in Indonesia and the Philippines already,
and more will surely follow.
12.
The Department of Agricultural Extension has decided, based on the
results obtained this past year, to extend SRI evaluation and demonstration
to all rice-growing areas in the country. It has found that SRI
methods can usually add 1-2 t/ha under a range of Bangladesh conditions.
The department will set up SRI demonstrations in 64 districts in
the coming boro (dry) season. Mr. Wasiuzzaman Akonda, a deputy director-general
of DAE, who pioneered SRI trials in 1999-2000 in Kishorganj district
and who attended the Sanya conference, has been officially given
responsibility for overseeing SRI activities on behalf of the Department.
This is the first national department of extension to take such
an official step to promote SRI evaluation and use.
|